Call me’sen’ a blogger.
The shame!!
Anyhoo…
I was having a conversation on Saturday evening with a friend who has just been hired to go into schools and discuss “negative prejudice” and to challenge youths opinions of what is acceptable and what is not (in terms of their prejudices etc etc)
The inevitable question came up:
“What is your prejudice?“
I find this a very difficult question to answer. Being the ever politically correct, well-educated, well informed, young(at heart), white, middle class (yes, I said it!) male, I’d love to say that I have none. But I think we all really know that that’s not true. I can’t believe for a second that anyone is prejudice-less given the incessant programming thrust at our various demographics.
So, P, define “Prejudice”.
The dictionary says:
1. an unfavorable opinion or feeling formed beforehand or without knowledge, thought, or reason.
2. any preconceived opinion or feeling, either favorable or unfavorable.
3. unreasonable feelings, opinions, or attitudes, esp. of a hostile nature, regarding a racial, religious, or national group.
Good. We all agree that based on the above, that prejudice is a bad, BAAAAAAAAD thing. And we as edu-mah-cated, self-conscious and aware individuals have a responsibility to fight the evil from any and all standpoints.
So I began to think about the things that I may or may judge negatively before being informed. And into my head popped about 15 hugely silly stereotypes such as gold wearing, ferrari badge toting Italians, Loud Québecoises on vacation, A family of asians seemingly deep in intense debate, but actually having a regular conversation.
So I asked the question, “What’s the difference between a prejudice and a stereotype?“
To which I was replied: “A prejudice is a stereotype that you actually subscribe to and believe in?“
Uh. Huh.
But isn’t it true that stereotypes have an element of truth and that they are ‘cartoonized’ for us all to, um, enjoy?
My point being, that most stereotypes are based on a reality:
1. I need only to walk to the corner of Peel and St Catherine to see the black kids in the baggy pants and bandanas selling weed.
2. I need only to hang out on the Corner of Crescent and St Catherine on a Friday evening to know that that baseball capped, Abercrombie and Fitch wearing Bostonian will doubtless drink way too much, be loud and obnoxious and vomit on our city’s streets tonight.
3. And as much as I hate to admit it, I get nervous from time to time when I ride the metro and see a nervous middle eastern gentleman. Not every time. But sometimes. ANd I genuinely hate to admit that.
So KNOWING that I do, in fact, subscribe to stereotypes to a level, does this make me an ignorant and base bigot?
I don’t think so. I’m pretty sure that I have a level grounding on what is acceptable and what is not. But is that because I would never ‘call’ someone on it? But I’ll think it, and time and time again (with the exception of any personal experience with the last in my trilogy of examples), I’m proved right.
So I laugh about it (again, with the exception of 3) and move on. But I’ll think it again the next time. That’s the level of my prejudice and as much as I try to subscribe to the “innocent until proved guilty” mantra, there are some experiences that I know, hand on heart that I can’t look past.
What worries me as an ever politically correct, well-educated, well informed, young(at heart), white, middle class (yes, I said it!) male, is that my views or reasonings are not a thousand miles away from those who we deem to be unbearable and unreasonable bigots, racists and terrorists. They may just choose to vocalize it with the same level of internal belief.
Hmmm. Maybe ‘prejudice’ should be looked at in the same way as Dante’s 7 levels of hell.
…and I have a son on the way and don’t know what the hell to tell him when the time comes…
So what are your prejudices?…
An additional thought: Are prejudices somehow linked to some kind of belief of superiority? It struck me after I realised that I am prejudiced against those who cannot spell. Or against those who’s grammar is outrageously bad.
Just food for thought.